Talk to us
Systems by size
Small SystemsMedium SystemsLarge / Utility-Scale SystemsUPS Solutions
Every system
Arctium FLEXArctium EDGEArctium GeluArctium BlockArctium GridArctium VRLA batteriesConversion & PCSEMS & controlsEV charging
Programs
BC Hydro ESIGlobal AdjustmentCapacity AuctionFast frequency responseDemand chargesClean Technology ITCClean Electricity ITCSave on EnergyCIB & Indigenous equitySREPs / watchlist
Talk to us
Innovation

Hydrogen from an abundant mineral

A proprietary mineral reactor that generates hydrogen continuously. The fuel ships as ordinary solid cargo; the byproduct is recycled back to the source mineral.

Mining Construction Remote communities Agriculture Data centres
Mineral charge in the reactor
Mineral charge in the reactor
The problem

A logistics problem before it is an energy problem

Fuel cost Delivered diesel is the largest operating line on most remote sites.
Transport cost You pay to move the tank as well as the fuel.
Supply disruption A washed-out road or a late barge stops production.
Device reliability Generation fails where it is hardest to service.
Resource limits Renewable resource is uneven; worst-season storage is expensive.
The process

Metal to hydrogen, in four steps

01
Load

Proprietary mineral fuel-blend pellets are charged into the reactor. Stable, non-pressurised, shippable as ordinary cargo.

02
Melt

The charge is superheated and enters the molten phase in which the reaction runs.

03
React

Water contacts the molten charge and hydrogen is liberated from it.

04
Recover

Hydrogen and usable heat come off continuously; the oxidised byproduct is collected for recycling back to the source mineral.

The loop

Byproducts are recycled back to the source mineral at under roughly 20 cents per kilogram — a circular process rather than a fuel you keep buying.

Advantages

Why this differs from the other clean options

Simple logistics

Solid pellets, no pressurised gas, no cryogenics, no tank weight.

No central processing

Generation happens where the power is consumed.

Positive net energy

Unlike electrolyser-and-fuel-cell chains.

Serviceable

A thermochemical reactor with few moving parts.

Scalable

Output follows the charge rate; capacity is added in units.

Small footprint

Fits where a genset already sits.

Comparison

Against everything else on the table

Technology Cost per kWh Energy density CO₂
Arctium mineral thermochemical H₂ $0.102 – 0.139 3.31 / 6.38 kWh/kg Neutral
Diesel generators $0.15 – 0.57 12 kWh/kg High
Natural gas $0.05 – 0.10 13 kWh/kg High
Solar PV (utility) $0.05 – 0.28 Zero
Wind $0.04 – 0.09 Zero
Hydroelectric $0.05 – 0.12 Low
Battery storage $0.15 – 0.30 Zero
Swipe the table →

Arctium internal analysis. The mineral thermochemical figure assumes 90% efficiency with 10% heat recovery. Comparator ranges are indicative and vary by jurisdiction, resource and site.